Skip to content
Work Tech Weekly
Work Tech Weekly_Episode 12_Trent Cotton BLOG HEADER-1

The Candid Truth About AI in Talent Acquisition

There's a lot of sizzle in AI in talent acquisition right now. Agentic this. Autonomous that. You can't open LinkedIn without someone telling you that recruiters are either superheroes or extinct, depending on the hour.

Trent Cotton has a different read. The conference circuit and client reality are operating in parallel universes right now. And he's got the data to back it up.

Trent is head of talent insights and analyst relations at ICIMS — one of the most established TA platforms in the business, 25 years deep, fresh off a significant rebrand, and in the middle of a serious push around AI-powered recruiting. Before crossing to the vendor side, Trent spent nearly two decades as a practitioner with tech and banking companies. He's been in the seat. He knows what TA teams actually deal with when the vendor decks get put away.

This conversation was recorded live at Transform 2026 in Las Vegas. We talked about where AI adoption in talent acquisition actually stands, why governance needs to come before the build, and what a client telling you to "meet me where I am" really means when you're a platform with 25 years of momentum.

Trent’s stance is unapologetically pragmatic: “We're playing to where our clients are, where our prospects are, and where we see the market is — not where the glam and the glitter is.”

The Candid Truth About AI in Talent Acquisition
  28 min
The Candid Truth About AI in Talent Acquisition
Work Tech Weekly
Play

The Gap Between the Hype Cycle and the Hiring Team

ICIMS, in partnership with Aptitude Research's Madeline Laurano, has an AI adoption report dropping April 8. Trent gave us the preview, and it supports his position that there’s a gulf between conference chatter about AI and what’s actually happening in the real world. 

The headline stat: 69% of TA organizations say they're using AI somewhere in the process. But only 45% said they're even considering agentic AI.

“There are a lot of influencers and talking heads talking about the agent and thinking this is where the market's going,” Trent says. “But we talk to our clients all the time … They're not ready for agentic. They're in Gen AI and automation — and there's still a huge lift in efficiency you can get just from AI-assisted automation.”

That's not a failure of imagination. That's a market being honest about where it actually is.

Governance First. Not Retrofitted. First.

Here's where Trent got blunt — and where I stopped taking mental notes and started actually thinking.

The companies that got burned by AI in TA largely got burned the same way: they moved fast, skipped the governance framework, and then spent twice as long cleaning up the mess on the back end.

“Governance has kind of got a bad rap,” Trent says. “It slows things down. But if you do governance right, it speeds things up — it's just on the tail end.”

ICIMS has been doing AI since 2018. They built the governance framework first. They're one of the few with TrustArc certification and with third-party audits on their AI processes. For clients in regulated industries — many ICIMS clients are — that's not a differentiator. That's the price of admission.

The lesson: don't retrofit governance. Build it into the foundation. The organizations skipping that step aren't moving faster. They're just accumulating a debt they haven't paid yet.

The Candidate Trust Problem Is a Transparency Problem (And It’s Fixable)

Candidates say AI declined them. TA leaders say automation made a threshold-based decision. Both are technically right. Neither is communicating clearly.

Trent's fix is almost embarrassingly simple: Show candidates the map.

“Take the time to chart out the journey and say ‘You are here,’” he says. “Here's where we use humans, here's what's done by AI.” That's it. That's the transparency play. Automation has been in recruiting since 2005. DQs aren't new. But when candidates can't see the criteria, they fill the silence with distrust.

The candidate experience piece that actually got me, though, was the skills-matching angle. Trent described a scenario where a software developer applies for one role, and AI surfaces that their project management experience might qualify them for a product manager opening they didn't even know existed. That's not AI replacing the recruiter. That's AI expanding the candidate's own sense of what's possible.

That's a good use of the technology. More of that, please.

Recruiters Are Getting Hours Back. Here's What They're Doing With Them.

The ICIMS report will show that AI is saving recruiters a measurable number of hours per week. Trent wouldn't tell us the exact number. We get it. Embargoes, amiright?

But he told us what recruiters are doing with the time they're getting back When he saw the data, his reaction was: "Yes. That's exactly where I want them going."

He's not going to say what it is. But everything in this conversation points in one direction: they're reinvesting it in the human side of the work. The conversations. The relationships. The moments when a good recruiter says, “Just hear me out,” to a candidate who wasn't even looking.

That's the augmentation argument, and it's a better one than most of the conference decks are making right now.

What TA Gets Right That Every Other Function Should Watch

AI is being talked about as a technological transformation. Trent pushed back on that framing gently, but clearly.

“It's also a human transformation,” he said. “We're looking at where's the value of work? Who needs to be doing, or what needs to be doing that work? So that whole value concept is changing completely. And that's a people thing.”

Which is why HR keeps getting pulled to the front of the AI conversation, whether they want to be or not. They shouldn't be surprised. Every major tech implementation eventually fails the same way: at the finish line, with adoption. HR knows that. They've lived it. That institutional memory is actually an asset right now if they're willing to use it.

Trent's closer was the one thing I'd put on a poster: AI does not solve all problems. But the right people can.

The organizations winning with AI in TA right now aren't the ones moving the fastest. They're the ones being honest enough to map the process, circle what stays human, and build governance into the foundation before anything else.

Meet clients where they are. Fix the transparency gap. Give recruiters their time back so they can do the work only they can do.

Turns out the glam and the glitter can wait.

Let's Talk